i warned you that there was more.
as i searched to find what is best for me, my baby, and the planet, i read reviews of different kinds of disposable diapers. the most surprising and alarming complaint i found was in regards to seventh generation's chlorine and chemical free diapers.
people actually reported that these diapers are ugly.
this is a perfect instance where i feel like i do not fit in in this society, because ugly? UGLY?!
ugly, to me, is the diaper on the right (below), the most common diaper known.

it is so very hard for me to understand how garish cartoons advertising a tv show on a baby's bottom is not ugly and plain is. anyway.
i found that chlorine&chemical free diapers are better for the baby and for the planet. ok, duh.
and they have way less plastic and are partially biodegrade.
i tried three different brands: whole foods', seventh generation, and nature baby (L to R, below), all equally attractive.

i also ordered the starter kit of gdiapers, which have a flushable-if-you-have-good-plumbing (i don't) insert (inside a cloth cover with a snap-in plastic liner), which also can be composted or trashed, as it decomposes in a few months. here is a gdiaper next to the seventh generation model:


get to the point, you say?
well. the gdiaper inserts cost twice as much as pampers, and the c&c free dipes are in the middle of the two extremes. the gdiaper is bulky and hard to travel with because of all the parts that have to go together. they are the next best thing, environmentally, to cloth (if you don't wash the cloths 3 times per use, as recommended), though.
as for the c&c free sposies (i do love the nicknames, and i didn't make them up), when considering bulk, cost, tabs, rise, and of course couture, seventh generation wins easily.
in conclusion, i am using the gdiapers at home some, and the sevgen the most. and that's that.
tune in next time for gunky's exciting views on babyfood . . .